The Asian Commercial Sex Scene  

Go Back   The Asian Commercial Sex Scene > For stuff you can't discuss with your Facebook Account > Coffee Shop Talk of a non sexual Nature

Notices

Coffee Shop Talk of a non sexual Nature Visit Sam's Alfresco Heaven. Singapore's best Alfresco Coffee Experience! If you're up to your ears with all this Sex Talk and would like to take a break from it all to discuss other interesting aspects of life in Singapore,  pop over and join in the fun.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 04-10-2014, 10:30 PM
Sammyboy RSS Feed Sammyboy RSS Feed is offline
Sam's RSS Feed Bot - I'm not Human. Don't talk to me.
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 467,263
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
My Reputation: Points: 10000241 / Power: 3357
Sammyboy RSS Feed has a reputation beyond reputeSammyboy RSS Feed has a reputation beyond reputeSammyboy RSS Feed has a reputation beyond reputeSammyboy RSS Feed has a reputation beyond reputeSammyboy RSS Feed has a reputation beyond reputeSammyboy RSS Feed has a reputation beyond reputeSammyboy RSS Feed has a reputation beyond reputeSammyboy RSS Feed has a reputation beyond reputeSammyboy RSS Feed has a reputation beyond reputeSammyboy RSS Feed has a reputation beyond reputeSammyboy RSS Feed has a reputation beyond repute
Thumbs up Ass Loon DOESN'T (want to) UNDERSTAND WHAT SGs WANT. One-Familee Rule Reigns!

An honorable member of the Coffee Shop Has Just Posted the Following:

PM LEE DOESN'T UNDERSTAND WHAT THE PEOPLE WANT

.node-article .field-name-link-line-above-tags{float: right;}.node-article .field-name-ad-box-in-article {float: left;margin: 15px 15px 10px 0;}.node-article .field-tags{clear: both;} Post date:
4 Oct 2014 - 8:12pm








At the NUS Society Lecture on Friday, Lee Hsien Loong commented that the Opposition Parties were being populist and irresponsible for calling for zero foreign worker inflow.
It looks like he has a problem with the English language or he is deliberately twisting the words of Opposition Party politicians.
The Workers' Party had not called for zero worker inflow.
In 2012 in a Parliament debate, Low Thia Khiang had said: “I agree we should not be over-reliant on foreign workers; we should not allow foreign workers to take away Singaporeans’ rice bowls. This is not protectionism, but a responsibility of the Government to the people. However, we also know that we have limited population, (and) we need foreign workers to fill up the gap in our domestic labour market.”
At the Population White Paper debate subsequently, the Workers' Party had reiterated this position by calling for the overall number of foreign workers to be capped if we can achieve a 1 per cent annual growth rate in the local workforce.






Based on June 2012 data, there were already 1.5 million non-residents in Singapore, of which 1.2 million were foreign workers.
So which part of its statement says that it is calling for zero inflow, Lee Hsien Loong?
For the Workers' Party's position, see:
http://wp.sg/2013/02/wps-position-on...en-consistent/
The Alternative View
*Article first appeared on https://www.facebook.com/358759327518739/photos/a.598097686918234.107374...


Click here to view the whole thread at www.sammyboy.com.
Advert Space Available
Bypass censorship with https://1.1.1.1

Cloudflare 1.1.1.1
Reply



Bookmarks

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT +8. The time now is 10:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copywrong © Samuel Leong 2006 ~ 2025 ph