#1
|
|||
|
|||
How Accurate are Field Reports? NOT!
Curious what other Bros think, I am new to this site and to SG. But not new to the P4P scene - been active in that for 10+ years in Asia. And active on ISG, WSG, etc.
Here in S'pore I was looking for a high quality girl and thought maybe the escort services would be the place to go. I consulted Field Reports which are located on one of the linked/sponsoring Escort Services (e.g. Kings, Playboy, Viet Stars, etc). On that site are posted the details and pictures of the WLs and many have threads with FRs from chongsters who claim to have tried the girls. I read these and SMSed the service confirming I wanted 18-22 yr old hottie. They suggested one for $200 (w/room and doms) a 20 yr old "tall model". Seems expensive but sometimes you get what you pay for and I thought I'd try the most expensive girl on their site. This chick had 3 great FR, all claiming that she was better looking than the pics. Well, this was all a load of horseshit: The Claim: "20yo, 1.70m, 49kg" The Truth: She looked and told me she was 29!, 1.7 is about right, more like 55 kg The FR: "Looks: 9/10 (95% ACCURACY..real hot looks)" The TRUTH: Her face was so ugly that I literally tried to put a pillow over her face cause it was distracting to look at Had to flip her over to be able to cum in the end. The FR: nice rounded boobs (Cup C) The TRUTH: Her tits are poorly done fakes, getting rock hard. FR #3: "doggie in front of the mirror " The TRUTH: there is no mirror except the one above the sink in the tiny bathroom. (Her service was great however one of the best sloppy wet deep throat BBBJs I've had in a while) Do the services have somebody in a cubical writing and posting these fraudulent reports? Or are members just making stuff up to curry favours? So my point is: isn't one of the primary reasons for a site like this is to provide accurate FRs so other brothers don't get scammed and good WL get more business? Why isn't the board set up in someway so that we can post and get good FRs on the escorts? (Like the FRs for Geyling, which I still am hoping are not faked) Is it becasue the escort services are sponsors and they don't want us talking candidly about what service we can expect? Or is there a place on the site I am missing?? And, one more SG newbie question, why the hell is it called "painting"?? DATY makes some sense anyway. Cheers! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How Accurate are Field Reports? NOT!
Painting = Pussy licking.
I know where you coming from dude. Just wanna share these advice :- FR could be from clone(s) to upgrade the gal stats to sell better. One man's meat is another man's poison. See the FR comes from which samster. Probably the high point/power would help to filter genuine cheongster. Dun be lazy, do your search and study, choose your own gal to bonk. People gives you want without knowledge will not be good, unless you guys are in alliance. But looking at your stats, unlikely so. Better luck next round.......
__________________
Many BIG THANK YOU to those who have UPPED my point ... Let us continue to share in this forum to make it BETTER !!! |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Re: How Accurate are Field Reports? NOT!
bro...
when the door open and u find she is not wat your expected.. walk away man..
__________________
There are no saints in a sex forum... if you can read this, despite your claims of merely being a passerby/lurker/silent reader, you are already tainted and have been corrupted.... welcome to the darkside !!! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How Accurate are Field Reports? NOT!
haha seems like alot of samsters convert to become p/t okt
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How Accurate are Field Reports? NOT!
Sammyboyforum translations:
Young = below 35 Fresh = below 30 Looks like "insert actress name" = shares the same features of having two eyes, one mouth, two eyebrows etc... Best I ever had = Best I ever afforded Cute = Fat GND = that ugly neighbor u had growing up, yeah, she looks like that Looks that grow on you = Yeah, like fungus Looks is 7/10 = 5/10 by realistic standards Looks is 9/10 = business is bad so must lie a bit Milf = Fat, Ugly with a spare tyre. Also likely to have caesarean scars or ultra loose. Local = Singaporeans who look worse than their PRC counterparts but can talk with a Singlish accent. Never understood why Singlish costs an addition 300-400 per hour. Slim = Her protruding bones cuts painfully into you with each stroke in doggy Nice Body = Butter face 36DD = bad eyesight or push-up bra Natural big boobs = sagging to the ground papayas Just joking You sometimes stumble on a gem or two, but most of these girls online are usually attractive towards the 50+ crowd (for some reason old chinese man like chubby, average girls) but if you're 18-40 and like the model types, you're unlikely to find them online. They make enough in KTVs if they're that hot or just lounging around in bars. If you have 200 to spend, just go along the legal houses in Geylang or prowl at Ipanema where you can see before you spend. I'm sure you can find something to your taste. And 200 is a piss in the bucket in Singapore. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Re: How Accurate are Field Reports? NOT!
FR ?
seldom bro here post FR , if one really did , it either the girl was great or too CMI . look for FR that is posted by senior brother and not clone will be better . but 1 man meat is another man poison , dont take it too serious ~
__________________
I'm Just A Fool Lost In The Sea Of Love. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How Accurate are Field Reports? NOT!
Maybe our SG standards are different.
You may like to try out the Legal Geylang Scene whereby you can view the girls before choosing. However, do take note that they have different rates for non-asians. Also, for FLs or so-called escorts, you better try FL 3 section instead as although they charge higher, they have better quality and service standards. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How Accurate are Field Reports? NOT!
Good advice bros. SG is a harder scene than I expected to find quality. Spent lots of time in the 4 floors and still only spot a nice SYT a few times. Geyling was a bust the last time I was there, but having seen some what appears to be higher quality reporting will try that again. I do like the ass at Brix but don't always have the freedom to be out that late (wife!).
And will have a look in the FL3 boards. But, to conclude there is not a SBF board where one can find FRs on FLs in some organised or searchable format? Would be a great thing. Lots of other boards have it - take a look at myredbook.com. That is a business model that works and has a super searchable database of hookers available to senior members or those willing to pay a few bucks for access. SBF might consider a similiar section as I must not be the only sad fuck who would like to have a higher hit rate on WLs. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How Accurate are Field Reports? NOT!
Quote:
We only appreciate fellow members who share positively. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Re: How Accurate are Field Reports? NOT!
That is the power of advertising bro!
__________________
"The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy" |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How Accurate are Field Reports? NOT!
All field reports have to be taken with a pinch of salt. Furthermore, we all have differing standards.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How Accurate are Field Reports? NOT!
Braddah, one mans treasure is anothers trash to borrow an Ang Moh saying.
__________________
Ask not what SG society can do for you but what you can do for SG society. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Re: How Accurate are Field Reports? NOT!
Bro, it is true that some are good and some are rotten. Be it we who choose the pick. If it is not what you want and you have not pay, just say "I knock the wrong door"
It is our little brother that we have not yet tame that cause you to walk into the room isn't it. I know because I was also one of the fool that walk into it. At the end od the day, this is what we call adventure!!! If you do not know what is rotten how can you appreciate beauty. Take it like a man |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Re: How Accurate are Field Reports? NOT!
I always read them with a pnich of salt. I don't take them seriously . Because at the end of the day it is your personal experience with the gal.
Last edited by lightningcobra; 12-10-2011 at 09:49 PM. |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Re: How Accurate are Field Reports? NOT!
what you see about the field reports are usually not the truth
the pictures of girls are 'remade' to make them look nicer when you go there, you will get a shock it's better to 'inspect' 1st before you do anything this is why I quite prefer the pasar malam approach at Geylang |
Advert Space Available |
Bookmarks |
|
|