|
Sexual Health Issues If you need medical advice regarding your sexual health, ask Dr Tan. We are honored to have an In House Doctor who is here to help. |
|
Thread Tools |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
STD/HIV rates in GL
how do u guys rate how widespread STD/HIV and the possible STD/HIV pros carriers in GL?i would say -
cat $150 : STD - 60% HIV - 0.5% cat $50 : STD - 65% HIV - 1% illegal cat : STD - 85% HIV - 15% anyone heard of anyone kena HIV from GL? how about DSC?do they announce how many std/hiv pros carriers they detect every month..that would let us evaluate our chances of getting hit... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: STD/HIV rates in GL
Quote:
__________________
Humble English language of HI...... |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Re: STD/HIV rates in GL
Quote:
__________________
Still lurking around |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: STD/HIV rates in GL
If DSC publishes rates of infection on STD, it will be skewed towards the low end because of the 1 month checkup interval. I've always thought it was too long an interval to be tested - weekly or fortnightly would be better. Build the cost in into the prices as a use tax.
In GL40, when a provider contracts an STD, she will be temporarily suspended until DSC clears her. The caveat here is the suspension only takes effect if she is fails a DSC test. But oftentimes, when providers get infected "out-of-cycle" (the girls know when things are not hunky-dory down there), they simply visit private practitioners (who do you think the GPs in Geylang make their money off?) to obtain antibiotics to clear up the infection. During this period, guess what, they're still turning tricks unhindered by any suspension. I don't want to be chicken little but to be forewarned is to be forearmed. Giddly Quote:
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Logically speaking, there should be a -ve correlation between price and STD rates because, the lower the price the higher the demand.
However in real life, this may not be true as the diff price cats cater for cheongsters with differing budgets... The moral from this post therefore is to use the dreaded rubber... |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
juz wondering since we're discussing about probability here; by doing raw once with one of those HIV +ve person, does it mean you'll 100% get the virus too? or are there also some chances between getting it and not? I think so...
i read somewhere that women are more prone to contracting std/hiv as compared to men (given same exposure). in US, women is 4 times more likely to be infected as men. also, quoted from thebody.com... (those in bold i've highlighted myself) Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by goodpartner; 25-02-2003 at 11:18 PM. |
Advert Space Available |
Bookmarks |
|
|