There are a very few great ones service wise.
A good number of decent/acceptable MLs (I include here the vanillas/SNs, depends on your type).
The remainder are average/mediocre/overpriced; you won't remember them after they RTC (except the overpriced).
A small number of poor providers (who make you wish you never visited).
You have high rating of current batch
Maybe each of us shall list down the top 3 best interm of different category:
1.look
2.figure
3. Sensual
4. Massage
Sh!t, there are a whooping 150+ girls on SLG alone! how many ML/FLs do we really have in sg actually? From little tiger era and beyond that.. do we have so much choices before?
the slg platform owner fucking huat now. imagine min 1k per listing per month.
You have high rating of current batch
Maybe each of us shall list down the top 3 best interm of different category:
1.look
2.figure
3. Sensual
4. Massage
What's the point?
You will just find it harder to book the ml thereafter
There are a very few great ones service wise.
A good number of decent/acceptable MLs (I include here the vanillas/SNs, depends on your type).
The remainder are average/mediocre/overpriced; you won't remember them after they RTC (except the overpriced).
A small number of poor providers (who make you wish you never visited).
But bro, there are quite a lot of positive reviews for many MLs here in this thread itself. So we should read them with a pinch of salt?
Location:10/10 Relatively close to a North-South line, very spacious apartment. Same building as A****.
Looks: 5/10 Cute face as in the photographs but with bucked teeth, double chin and smaller eyes.
Body: 7/10 Soft boobs with small nipples; size and shape acceptable but I expected 'more' based on the photographs. Short and chubby.
GFE/sensual: 10/10 Sexy lingerie during massage; FN except for panties during sensual. Lots of fake sex, peck on lips, moaning, etc. Also allowed roaming south.
Attitude: 10/10 Very pleasant personality. Nice voice and she speaks Cantonese if it is your thing. Bed was clean and smelled good.
Massage: 8/10 Good strength and hardworking. Asked if I wanted more massage after sensual.
HJ: 10/10 Not mechanical but also not much of a HJ required after so much teasing.
RTM: 8/10
Last edited by qwertysbfsg; 18-11-2022 at 08:56 AM.
Reason: Location
But bro, there are quite a lot of positive reviews for many MLs here in this thread itself. So we should read them with a pinch of salt?
Are there? Many of the positives are the same few MLs. The rest are likely to be fake - these are the ones that tell you to take care of the gal.
Also the low standard 'reviews'. Another bro wrote a funny post recently about MRs saying the ML looks different from the pictures but won't reject kind.
Location:10/10 River Valley, very spacious apartment. Same building as A****.
Looks: 5/10 Cute face as in the photographs but with bucked teeth, double chin and smaller eyes.
Body: 7/10 Soft boobs with small nipples; size and shape acceptable but I expected 'more' based on the photographs. Short and chubby.
GFE/sensual: 10/10 Sexy lingerie during massage; FN except for panties during sensual. Lots of fake sex, peck on lips, moaning, etc. Also allowed roaming south.
Attitude: 10/10 Very pleasant personality. Nice voice and she speaks Cantonese if it is your thing. Bed was clean and smelled good.
Massage: 8/10 Good strength and hardworking. Asked if I wanted more massage after sensual.
HJ: 10/10 Not mechanical but also not much of a HJ required after so much teasing.
RTM: 8/10
Are there? Many of the positives are the same few MLs. The rest are likely to be fake - these are the ones that tell you to take care of the gal.
Also the low standard 'reviews'. Another bro wrote a funny post recently about MRs saying the ML looks different from the pictures but won't reject kind.
Oh I see, thank you for showing the ropes bro! Now I know which are the reviews to look out for.
Being a newbie in this scene, there is so much to learn thanks to the helpful bros around!
16-11-2022, 03:04 PM
t Similar Threads
