|
Adult Discussions about SEX Misc chit chat about sex, whores, girls, love and lust. This section is a ZAP FREE zone. |
|
Thread Tools |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Wrong Information on Sex
I heard of some youngster got this mistaken idea of swallow sperm will make the gal to have babies. That really funny.
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Wrong Information on Sex
Quote:
On hearing this, I was totally speechless. *sighs*
__________________
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Wrong Information on Sex
Quote:
This is a well-practised "trick" advocated by all fertility specialists ... where the problem is the guys' weak or sick sperm, this "overturn manoeuvre" make use of the force of nature called gravity, instead of wasting energy fighting against it.
__________________
Walk on through the wind, Walk on through the rain, Tho' your dreams be tossed & blown. Walk on, walk on with hope in your heart, You'll never walk alone, You'll never, ever walk alone. |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Wrong Information on Sex
Oh no... Now I feel like an idiot.
__________________
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Wrong Information on Sex
Quote:
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Wrong Information on Sex
some religion prohibit the use of condoms.
__________________
4/7/12: Cleared my inbox. Can send me message again. Ran with hot pink FBT shorts, inner netting removed, can feel so many eyes ogling at my long fleshy legs. Selective lady who is nymphomaniac and like to wear sexy when clubbing. Message/Add me as contact to club together. |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Wrong Information on Sex
Quote:
I always relate prc girls to girls who grew up in an environment similar to our parents, and you know in our parents' time, nobody uses condom. So when I understand that, there isn't much to feel shocked. Its almost equivalent to those shotgun cases in Singapore when young children still cannot handle their own urges and do silly things. But if the girl still have raw sex with guys (albeit bf or otherwise), and think its safe, then they only invite trouble. I guess in such cases, they are basing on misconception on pregnancy. |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Wrong Information on Sex
Quote:
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Wrong Information on Sex
Quote:
Must be the work of a smart bf into convincing the girl to swallow. Now is that why some TCS actresses have such great skin? |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Wrong Information on Sex
Quote:
That friend ask this Malay guy what was his age and he said 40+ close to 50, but he look liked he was in early 30s. He was not afraid to share he "fountain of youth" secret; that is by drinking his own sperm I dun think I will do that! |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Wrong Information on Sex
Quote:
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Wrong Information on Sex
Quote:
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Wrong Information on Sex
I think this thinking is quite common, even amongst SG gers. As long as they think you clean .. and not fooling around. This is usually achieved when they have been wif you for a period of time and acting like GF/BF liao.
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Wrong Information on Sex
Quote:
Anti-Grooming Law: The First Step Sunday, Dec 9th, 2007 at 8:30 pm Among the recent amendments to the Penal Code is a new offence of “Sexual grooming of minor under 16″. This offence is targeted at sexual predators who prowl Internet chat rooms hoping to procure minors for sexual activity. A person above 21 years of age commits this offence if he intentionally meets or travels to meet a minor. These acts must be done with the intention of committing a sexual offence with the minor. The accused must also have met or communicated with the minor on at least two prior occasions. Since no actual harm need occur to the minor for the offence to be made out, one can look at the new offence as an ‘attempt’ provision that aims to shield the minor from the harm of a sexual offence. A provision for attempts in general already exists in the Penal Code, so a comparison may be useful. Compared to the existing attempts provision, the new offence has a lower actus reus requirement. Merely meeting or travelling to meet a minor, as envisaged by the new offence, will not amount to “embarking on the crime proper”, which is the usual requirement for attempts under the Penal Code. The upshot is that the requisite mens rea will be harder to prove. Proving that an accused who merely travelled to meet a minor intended to commit a sexual offence will not be easy. A great deal of additional evidence will be needed. This may include Internet chat records of a suggestive nature and the presence of pornography or condoms on the accused when he met or travelled to meet the minor. A person found guilty of sexual grooming may be fined and jailed for up to 3 years. In some cases, this may be disproportionately severe. Take, for example, an accused who meets a groomed minor with the intention of outraging her modesty, but is arrested before being able to do so. He may be jailed for up to 3 years under the new offence, although the maximum penalty for outrage of modesty is only 2 years. In practice, however, an accused who actually does outrage the modesty of a groomed minor is likely to be charged with both outrage of modesty and sexual grooming, attracting a penalty of up to 5 years’ imprisonment. The new provision may thereby operate as an ‘aggravating factor’: where a sexual offence is committed with a minor, the fact that the minor has been groomed may increase the maximum penalty by 3 years. A similar offence in the UK has primarily been used in this way. In most reported cases, the offender is charged with an actual sexual offence and the grooming offence. Should things turn out the same way in Singapore, the new offence may be inconsequential in practice, since courts here already recognise that grooming can be an ‘aggravating factor’. The only real change will be in the maximum possible penalty. Still, the new provision will be useful where there is enough evidence to show that an accused intends to commit a sexual offence. Being able to prevent the sexual offence from occurring will then be invaluable to the minor. These cases may be rare, but as NMP Siew Kum Hong notes, “online predators will now have to think twice, because even though it is difficult to prove, it’s not impossible.” But deterrence alone is unlikely to be a satisfactory solution. Parents and educators must also play their part by warning minors of the risks posed to them by the Internet. Public education may also help parents identify early warning signs, so that potential crimes can be prevented before it is too late. One innovative step that the UK has taken is to provide a telephone helpline for adults who have thought or are thinking about committing sexual offences with minors. The potential offender who calls is then counselled by trained staff who will advise him on how to prevent himself from offending. The helpline also assists parents who suspect that their children are being groomed. The service has been largely successful so far: it averages over 120 calls per month, 45% of those being from potential offenders. Implementing a similar service and exploring other non-legal measures could likewise go a long way towards protecting minors from sexual abuse here. The new anti-grooming offence may thus be little more than a first step, although it certainly is one in the right direction. source: The Singapore Law Review » Anti-Grooming Law: The First Step
__________________
Tip for ALL samsters: Keep your identity secret |
#30
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Wrong Information on Sex
Quote:
|
Advert Space Available |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
|
|