Sammyboy RSS Feed
12-08-2015, 05:40 PM
An honorable member of the Coffee Shop Has Just Posted the Following:
http://www.theonlinecitizen.com/2015...-from-the-top/ (http://www.theonlinecitizen.com/2015/08/luis-resignation-a-sign-of-weak-leadership-from-the-top/)
So, given these and many other issues, is it any wonder that the man at the helm has become the target of unhappiness?
And isn’t it simplistic for the likes of the Law Minister to point to so-called “unfair attacks” by the public to explain one possible reason for Mr Lui’s stepping down?
Mr Lui has done the honourable thing – whether he felt he had done his best or whether he felt he had failed to resolve the transport problems – by stepping down.
For this, perhaps the man ought to be applauded.
At least he does not make excuses for himself, or lays the blame on critics or “unfair attacks” or the convenient finger-pointing at “online criticisms”.
If indeed Mr Lui decided to step down because of these “unfair attacks”, then the blame really should be on the weak leadership from the top which shields those directly responsible for failures.
Ironically, it is Mr Lui who seems to have held himself to a higher standard than that of the Prime Minister, who has not shown the gumption to take his ministers (and others) to task but instead shields them with ill-conceived arguments – that “Singapore will not encourage a culture where ministers resign whenever things go wrong on their watch, whether or not they are actually to blame.”
This can only breed even more distrust and give rise to more criticisms.
Just look at the Auditor-General’s Office recent report on its audit of government ministries and statutory boards – has anyone been similarly held accountable at all after all these weeks?
Click here to view the whole thread at www.sammyboy.com (http://www.singsupplies.com/showthread.php?212511-Lui’s-resignation-–-a-sign-of-weak-leadership-from-the-top&goto=newpost).
http://www.theonlinecitizen.com/2015...-from-the-top/ (http://www.theonlinecitizen.com/2015/08/luis-resignation-a-sign-of-weak-leadership-from-the-top/)
So, given these and many other issues, is it any wonder that the man at the helm has become the target of unhappiness?
And isn’t it simplistic for the likes of the Law Minister to point to so-called “unfair attacks” by the public to explain one possible reason for Mr Lui’s stepping down?
Mr Lui has done the honourable thing – whether he felt he had done his best or whether he felt he had failed to resolve the transport problems – by stepping down.
For this, perhaps the man ought to be applauded.
At least he does not make excuses for himself, or lays the blame on critics or “unfair attacks” or the convenient finger-pointing at “online criticisms”.
If indeed Mr Lui decided to step down because of these “unfair attacks”, then the blame really should be on the weak leadership from the top which shields those directly responsible for failures.
Ironically, it is Mr Lui who seems to have held himself to a higher standard than that of the Prime Minister, who has not shown the gumption to take his ministers (and others) to task but instead shields them with ill-conceived arguments – that “Singapore will not encourage a culture where ministers resign whenever things go wrong on their watch, whether or not they are actually to blame.”
This can only breed even more distrust and give rise to more criticisms.
Just look at the Auditor-General’s Office recent report on its audit of government ministries and statutory boards – has anyone been similarly held accountable at all after all these weeks?
Click here to view the whole thread at www.sammyboy.com (http://www.singsupplies.com/showthread.php?212511-Lui’s-resignation-–-a-sign-of-weak-leadership-from-the-top&goto=newpost).