Sammyboy RSS Feed
04-07-2015, 08:00 AM
An honorable member of the Coffee Shop Has Just Posted the Following:
Ngerng insincere, exploited lawsuit, says lawyer
Quote:
Blogger Roy Ngerng was yesterday accused not only of being insincere in his repeated apologies to Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong for having defamed him, but also of exploiting the lawsuit to score political points and get more people to read his blog.
It is the Bayi who is exploiting the lawsuit and weaving a story to paint LHL as the victim. Only fools will believe the most powerful man in sinkapore is the victim of a jobless man.
Quote:
Senior Counsel Davinder Singh, in making the point, said Mr Ngerng's motives were evident from his "purely tactical" moves in deliberately and repeatedly perpetuating the libel even after receiving a lawyer's letter of demand to take down the defamatory blog post.
The Bayi contends that everything Ordinary Roy (OR) writes about the CPF is libel. OR made the apology, took down the defamatory post and yet that was not sufficient for the MOST POWERFUL man and the Bayi. They want him to shut up and say or write anything. OR refused. That's why they are seeking the LARGEST amount possible. No words of contempt can described the MOST POWERFUL man and the Bayi.
Quote:
Mr Singh, who is representing Mr Lee, also pointed out that Mr Ngerng, 34, had on repeated occasions tried to mislead Mr Lee, readers of his blog The Heart Truths, and even his own lawyers in his actions, adding: "Every time you get caught, you apologise out of convenience. But you carry on doing what you always intended to do."
Gosh, the Bayi wants sinkees to believe that the MOST POWERFUL man is easily misled. Goodness me, the MOST EXPENSIVE PM in the world is so dumb. What kind of lawyer is the Bayi? He portrays LHL as stupid, a poor victim that deserves our utmost sympathy. Yet he is the MOST POWERFUL man in sinkapore. It is a total contradiction!
PAP likes to talk in generalites because the details will always show up their lies.
Quote:
Mr Ngerng deleted the libellous post and apologised, but Mr Singh, in arguing for aggravated damages, cited how his actions since then displayed a deep and intense malice towards Mr Lee.
This is a new precedent ...hating someone is equivalent to libel. The Bayi is writing a new law if the judge agrees with him. Then sinkees must never express their hatred or dislike for the PAP elites or face libel suit.
That explains why Amos is in jail. He expressed hatred for Lee CONs You.
Quote:
Mr. Ngerng also taunted Mr Singh, saying he "has not succeeded in teasing the evidence out of my mouth", and warned him against conflating what he said were two separate issues: the defamation suit, and his allegations of government wrongdoing in the management of CPF funds.
Commoner versus the MOST POWERFUL man and the EVIL BAYI. The winner is Ordinary Roy.
The MOST POWERFUL man didn't want to hear or see any critcism on the CPF issues (concerns raised have yet to be addressed by the government and the MOST POWERFUL man). That's why he went after Ordinary Roy with a vengeance that is no different from any despotic ruler.
Two different issues, yet the BAYI muddles them up. Senior Counsel, supposedly the best in sinkapore. Shows how low our standards are.
Quote:
Over the course of the day, Roy challenged the Government to sue him on at least five occasions, if it takes offence at his articles.
And the government didn't because there was NO basis.
Wah, Ordinary Roy really put the EVIL BAYI to shame.
Quote:
While Mr Ngerng said he was petrified and anxious when he got the letter, Mr Singh pointed out that his purported feelings were not in line with his publication of the letter and the tone of his blog post. -
BAYI is now a psychologist and literary critic ...how does he substantiate his claims? Lawyers here don't bother to do their homework because they know we have kangaroo courts.
Quote:
The article contained such statements as: "I have tried my best to advocate for my fellow citizens. However, today, I am sued by the very Government which should be protecting its citizens, such as me. This is disappointing."
This, Mr Singh said, showed how Mr Ngerng wanted to "further twist the knife". The article remains online - when the blogger has had the full awareness of its repercussions - speaking volumes of Mr Ngerng's real intentions, he added.
How does that statement 'twist the knife'? Roy was just stating the fact.
Of course, the article remains online as it was not yet the deadline to remove it. Should Roy be penalized for adhering to the deadline imposed by the MOST POWERFUL Man.
Quote:
Mr Ngerng also produced a YouTube video, which got nearly 35,000 views, in which he said: "I do not regret what I have done." But he said this was in the context of him speaking on CPF and not defamation. Mr Singh pointed out that while the blogger promised Mr Lee he would delete the video, he instead made it private and shared it with four other people, who he was seeking advice from on its content. But Mr Ngerng said: "Privatising it is as good as it being removed, because it has been removed from public viewing except myself." The video was eventually removed.
Setting it to private is as good as taking it down. Bayi should explain why it is not. And Roy shared it for a reason, to seek clarification on its content. How is that libel??????
So, sharing with 4 people is considered as making it public? Roy was not allowed to talk about the CPF issue to anyone as well? Using the same logic, that would be considered as making his views public?
What is wrong with express your discontent with a government programme or policy?
Roy was complying as much as he could until the demands were totally unreasonable.
Quote:
Mr Ngerng added that he had gone above and beyond what he should do in deleting the video and four other articles at Mr Lee's request. He maintained they were not defamatory, saying he complied as he "didn't want to aggravate the hurt and distress and embarrassment the PM would feel".
We have a WEAK PM who is easily hurt, distressed and embarrassment. Please send him your love and support on his FB page and via twitter.
Quote:
Yet, to draw the attention of local and international media to his case, he e-mailed more than 70 journalists a link to another site that had reproduced his defamatory article, a link to his public apology and the letter of demand on his blog.
Mr Ngerng said that by including the apology, he had negated the effect of the offensive post.
Roy wanted the media to know that he had apologized to the MOST POWERFUL man. Of course the offensive post had to publish itself to provide context.
Bayi is very confused ...he doesn't know basic facts.
Quote:
He also rejected Mr Singh's charge that he was "consumed with a desire to promote" himself. Mr Singh had cited the blogger's marketing background, making him adept at "effective messaging", but Mr Ngerng said he never wanted to be popular. "It is because the PM sued me that I was forced to become the face of CPF. If the Government takes good care of Singaporeans, I will be happy to stop writing, and I will be more than happy to be a waiter or a cleaner," he said.
Gosh, TTSH had fired a real talent, given the high regard of Roy's talent by the MOST POWERFUL man and the BAYI.
See the contradiction in their portrayal of OR.
Click here to view the whole thread at www.sammyboy.com (http://singsupplies.com/showthread.php?209854-Evil-Bayi-can-tell-stories-well&goto=newpost).
Ngerng insincere, exploited lawsuit, says lawyer
Quote:
Blogger Roy Ngerng was yesterday accused not only of being insincere in his repeated apologies to Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong for having defamed him, but also of exploiting the lawsuit to score political points and get more people to read his blog.
It is the Bayi who is exploiting the lawsuit and weaving a story to paint LHL as the victim. Only fools will believe the most powerful man in sinkapore is the victim of a jobless man.
Quote:
Senior Counsel Davinder Singh, in making the point, said Mr Ngerng's motives were evident from his "purely tactical" moves in deliberately and repeatedly perpetuating the libel even after receiving a lawyer's letter of demand to take down the defamatory blog post.
The Bayi contends that everything Ordinary Roy (OR) writes about the CPF is libel. OR made the apology, took down the defamatory post and yet that was not sufficient for the MOST POWERFUL man and the Bayi. They want him to shut up and say or write anything. OR refused. That's why they are seeking the LARGEST amount possible. No words of contempt can described the MOST POWERFUL man and the Bayi.
Quote:
Mr Singh, who is representing Mr Lee, also pointed out that Mr Ngerng, 34, had on repeated occasions tried to mislead Mr Lee, readers of his blog The Heart Truths, and even his own lawyers in his actions, adding: "Every time you get caught, you apologise out of convenience. But you carry on doing what you always intended to do."
Gosh, the Bayi wants sinkees to believe that the MOST POWERFUL man is easily misled. Goodness me, the MOST EXPENSIVE PM in the world is so dumb. What kind of lawyer is the Bayi? He portrays LHL as stupid, a poor victim that deserves our utmost sympathy. Yet he is the MOST POWERFUL man in sinkapore. It is a total contradiction!
PAP likes to talk in generalites because the details will always show up their lies.
Quote:
Mr Ngerng deleted the libellous post and apologised, but Mr Singh, in arguing for aggravated damages, cited how his actions since then displayed a deep and intense malice towards Mr Lee.
This is a new precedent ...hating someone is equivalent to libel. The Bayi is writing a new law if the judge agrees with him. Then sinkees must never express their hatred or dislike for the PAP elites or face libel suit.
That explains why Amos is in jail. He expressed hatred for Lee CONs You.
Quote:
Mr. Ngerng also taunted Mr Singh, saying he "has not succeeded in teasing the evidence out of my mouth", and warned him against conflating what he said were two separate issues: the defamation suit, and his allegations of government wrongdoing in the management of CPF funds.
Commoner versus the MOST POWERFUL man and the EVIL BAYI. The winner is Ordinary Roy.
The MOST POWERFUL man didn't want to hear or see any critcism on the CPF issues (concerns raised have yet to be addressed by the government and the MOST POWERFUL man). That's why he went after Ordinary Roy with a vengeance that is no different from any despotic ruler.
Two different issues, yet the BAYI muddles them up. Senior Counsel, supposedly the best in sinkapore. Shows how low our standards are.
Quote:
Over the course of the day, Roy challenged the Government to sue him on at least five occasions, if it takes offence at his articles.
And the government didn't because there was NO basis.
Wah, Ordinary Roy really put the EVIL BAYI to shame.
Quote:
While Mr Ngerng said he was petrified and anxious when he got the letter, Mr Singh pointed out that his purported feelings were not in line with his publication of the letter and the tone of his blog post. -
BAYI is now a psychologist and literary critic ...how does he substantiate his claims? Lawyers here don't bother to do their homework because they know we have kangaroo courts.
Quote:
The article contained such statements as: "I have tried my best to advocate for my fellow citizens. However, today, I am sued by the very Government which should be protecting its citizens, such as me. This is disappointing."
This, Mr Singh said, showed how Mr Ngerng wanted to "further twist the knife". The article remains online - when the blogger has had the full awareness of its repercussions - speaking volumes of Mr Ngerng's real intentions, he added.
How does that statement 'twist the knife'? Roy was just stating the fact.
Of course, the article remains online as it was not yet the deadline to remove it. Should Roy be penalized for adhering to the deadline imposed by the MOST POWERFUL Man.
Quote:
Mr Ngerng also produced a YouTube video, which got nearly 35,000 views, in which he said: "I do not regret what I have done." But he said this was in the context of him speaking on CPF and not defamation. Mr Singh pointed out that while the blogger promised Mr Lee he would delete the video, he instead made it private and shared it with four other people, who he was seeking advice from on its content. But Mr Ngerng said: "Privatising it is as good as it being removed, because it has been removed from public viewing except myself." The video was eventually removed.
Setting it to private is as good as taking it down. Bayi should explain why it is not. And Roy shared it for a reason, to seek clarification on its content. How is that libel??????
So, sharing with 4 people is considered as making it public? Roy was not allowed to talk about the CPF issue to anyone as well? Using the same logic, that would be considered as making his views public?
What is wrong with express your discontent with a government programme or policy?
Roy was complying as much as he could until the demands were totally unreasonable.
Quote:
Mr Ngerng added that he had gone above and beyond what he should do in deleting the video and four other articles at Mr Lee's request. He maintained they were not defamatory, saying he complied as he "didn't want to aggravate the hurt and distress and embarrassment the PM would feel".
We have a WEAK PM who is easily hurt, distressed and embarrassment. Please send him your love and support on his FB page and via twitter.
Quote:
Yet, to draw the attention of local and international media to his case, he e-mailed more than 70 journalists a link to another site that had reproduced his defamatory article, a link to his public apology and the letter of demand on his blog.
Mr Ngerng said that by including the apology, he had negated the effect of the offensive post.
Roy wanted the media to know that he had apologized to the MOST POWERFUL man. Of course the offensive post had to publish itself to provide context.
Bayi is very confused ...he doesn't know basic facts.
Quote:
He also rejected Mr Singh's charge that he was "consumed with a desire to promote" himself. Mr Singh had cited the blogger's marketing background, making him adept at "effective messaging", but Mr Ngerng said he never wanted to be popular. "It is because the PM sued me that I was forced to become the face of CPF. If the Government takes good care of Singaporeans, I will be happy to stop writing, and I will be more than happy to be a waiter or a cleaner," he said.
Gosh, TTSH had fired a real talent, given the high regard of Roy's talent by the MOST POWERFUL man and the BAYI.
See the contradiction in their portrayal of OR.
Click here to view the whole thread at www.sammyboy.com (http://singsupplies.com/showthread.php?209854-Evil-Bayi-can-tell-stories-well&goto=newpost).