Sammyboy RSS Feed
14-01-2015, 12:40 PM
An honorable member of the Coffee Shop Has Just Posted the Following:
http://www.tremeritus.com/2015/01/13...o-be-involved/ (http://www.tremeritus.com/2015/01/13/pms-press-sec-entirely-proper-for-me-to-be-involved/)
Ms Chang continued, “From the notes, it is clear that Mr Ravi had informed the Court that Mr Ngerng would rely on the affidavit filed by him in the earlier summary judgment application as his evidence for the purposes of the assessment of damages. Mr Davinder Singh then gave Mr Ravi notice that if Mr Ngerng was going to give evidence for the purposes of the assessment of damages, Mr Singh would be cross-examining Mr Ngerng. Whereupon Mr Ravi promptly changed his position, and informed the Court that Mr Ngerng would ‘Therefore’ not be filing any evidence.”
This was the clearest indication that Mr Ngerng did not want to be cross-examined, she said.
“After saying that Mr Ngerng intended to rely on an earlier affidavit as his evidence, Mr Ravi did a hasty U-turn after Mr Singh said that he will cross-examine Mr Ngerng if he gives evidence. Mr Ravi was so determined that Mr Ngerng not be cross-examined that he even said to the Court ‘Enough Y[our] H[onour] I won’t be filing’,” she added.
Click here to view the whole thread at www.sammyboy.com (http://www.singsupplies.com/showthread.php?197955-PM’s-Press-Sec-Entirely-proper-for-me-to-be-involved&goto=newpost).
http://www.tremeritus.com/2015/01/13...o-be-involved/ (http://www.tremeritus.com/2015/01/13/pms-press-sec-entirely-proper-for-me-to-be-involved/)
Ms Chang continued, “From the notes, it is clear that Mr Ravi had informed the Court that Mr Ngerng would rely on the affidavit filed by him in the earlier summary judgment application as his evidence for the purposes of the assessment of damages. Mr Davinder Singh then gave Mr Ravi notice that if Mr Ngerng was going to give evidence for the purposes of the assessment of damages, Mr Singh would be cross-examining Mr Ngerng. Whereupon Mr Ravi promptly changed his position, and informed the Court that Mr Ngerng would ‘Therefore’ not be filing any evidence.”
This was the clearest indication that Mr Ngerng did not want to be cross-examined, she said.
“After saying that Mr Ngerng intended to rely on an earlier affidavit as his evidence, Mr Ravi did a hasty U-turn after Mr Singh said that he will cross-examine Mr Ngerng if he gives evidence. Mr Ravi was so determined that Mr Ngerng not be cross-examined that he even said to the Court ‘Enough Y[our] H[onour] I won’t be filing’,” she added.
Click here to view the whole thread at www.sammyboy.com (http://www.singsupplies.com/showthread.php?197955-PM’s-Press-Sec-Entirely-proper-for-me-to-be-involved&goto=newpost).