Sammyboy RSS Feed
25-10-2014, 02:10 AM
An honorable member of the Coffee Shop Has Just Posted the Following:
These are the same shit who kena chased around by real Indian FTrash rioters while exercising "maximum restraint". To the 60% lost sheep, if you still insist on returning such despotic and treacherous traitors to power, you deserve to go into extinction!
HAN HUI HUI AND ROY NGERNG GIVEN ADDITIONAL CHARGE OF "ILLEGAL DEMONSTRATION".node-article .field-name-link-line-above-tags{float: right;}.node-article .field-name-ad-box-in-article {float: left;margin: 15px 15px 10px 0;}.node-article .field-tags{clear: both;}
Post date:
24 Oct 2014 - 5:30pm
http://therealsingapore.com/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/field/image/Han%20Hui%20Hui%20and%20Roy%20Ngerng%203.jpg?itok= yIJuSrl3 (http://therealsingapore.com/sites/default/files/field/image/Han%20Hui%20Hui%20and%20Roy%20Ngerng%203.jpg)
[Latest Update]: The Police has given Han Hui Hui and Roy Ngerng an extra charge.
The Police called Ms Han and Roy to the Police Station today to charge them with two charges each. They were charged with “public nuisance” and were given an extra charge of committing an offence under Regulation 23(2)(b) under the Parks and Trees Regulations, Cap 216.
The first charge carries a fine of up to $1,000 and the second charge carries a penalty of up to $5,000. If the both of them are found guilty of both charges, they will each be made to pay as high as $6,000.
TRS understands that this is the first time that the Parks and Trees Regulations has been used to charge ordinary Singaporeans at the Hong Lim Park.
Ms Han was called to the Police Station at 2.30pm and Roy met the Police at 4.45pm today.
The police started calling up the attendees to the #ReturnOurCPF protest on 27 September 2014 to investigate them for “unlawful assembly”. 10 attendees were called up.
Four attendees were let off with a warning. TRS broke the news yesterday that six of them were charged with “public nuisance”. Ms Han and Roy found out today that they were both charged with a second penalty under Regulation 23(2)(b).
TRS understands that at least two others attendees were called up for interview yesterday. It is unknown what the police will charge them with.
The Police charged that Ms Han and Roy were the organisers of the #ReturnOurCPF protest and claimed that they did not apply for a permit to protest.
According to the letter given to them, the Police charged that Ms Han and Roy “organise(d) a demonstration at the area in Hong Lim Park known as the Speakers’ Corner, without the approval of the Commissioner of the Parks and Trees” and have thus committed a crime.
http://i.imgur.com/DUnc7BS.jpg
On NParks website, registrants are required to register for their event as a “Speech”, “Demonstration” or “Performance”. It is understood that the police has charged Ms Han and Roy for applying only for a “Speech” and not a “Demonstration”.
In effect, the Police wants to charge the both of them on a technicality. This charge carries a penalty of $5,000.
The six Singaporeans who have been charged, including Ms Han and Roy, have been told to appear at the state court at 1 Havelock Square on Monday, 27 October 2014, at 10am to face the charge.
The police warned the six who were charged that if they do not turn up or if they are late, a warrant would be sent to arrest them.
It is understood, however, that Ms Han is the sole organiser of the #ReturnOurCPF event. However, the Police has also charged Roy to implicate him with an additional charge.
Roy has also been charged with an offence which carries a maximum $5,000 penalty. If anyone is fined more than $2,000 in court, this will also disqualify them from standing for elections.
If the prosecution has come directly from the government, this would mean that the government is going all out to not only silence the two of them but to also prevent them from going into Parliament to question the government on its use of Singaporeans’ Central Provident Fund (CPF) retirement funds.
Ms Han and Roy have been speaking up to advocate that the government is transparent and accountable to Singaporeans on their management of Singaporeans’ CPF. The government has yet to respond to their demands.
TRS understands from the latest updates that the lawyer of the six Singaporeans, including Ms Han and Roy, will be charging them $20,000 in legal fees. If the six of them receive the maximum penalty, they will be fined for a total of $16,000.
To exercise their freedom of speech and expression to protect the rights of Singaporeans, this will cost the six of them a total of $36,000.
In Singapore, freedom of speech is not free, as this latest incident has shown.
Click here to view the whole thread at www.sammyboy.com (http://sammyboy.com/showthread.php?192673-FAP-Poodles-Tighten-Noose-Around-HHH-amp-Roy-Additional-Charge-of-Illegal-Demonstratio&goto=newpost).
These are the same shit who kena chased around by real Indian FTrash rioters while exercising "maximum restraint". To the 60% lost sheep, if you still insist on returning such despotic and treacherous traitors to power, you deserve to go into extinction!
HAN HUI HUI AND ROY NGERNG GIVEN ADDITIONAL CHARGE OF "ILLEGAL DEMONSTRATION".node-article .field-name-link-line-above-tags{float: right;}.node-article .field-name-ad-box-in-article {float: left;margin: 15px 15px 10px 0;}.node-article .field-tags{clear: both;}
Post date:
24 Oct 2014 - 5:30pm
http://therealsingapore.com/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/field/image/Han%20Hui%20Hui%20and%20Roy%20Ngerng%203.jpg?itok= yIJuSrl3 (http://therealsingapore.com/sites/default/files/field/image/Han%20Hui%20Hui%20and%20Roy%20Ngerng%203.jpg)
[Latest Update]: The Police has given Han Hui Hui and Roy Ngerng an extra charge.
The Police called Ms Han and Roy to the Police Station today to charge them with two charges each. They were charged with “public nuisance” and were given an extra charge of committing an offence under Regulation 23(2)(b) under the Parks and Trees Regulations, Cap 216.
The first charge carries a fine of up to $1,000 and the second charge carries a penalty of up to $5,000. If the both of them are found guilty of both charges, they will each be made to pay as high as $6,000.
TRS understands that this is the first time that the Parks and Trees Regulations has been used to charge ordinary Singaporeans at the Hong Lim Park.
Ms Han was called to the Police Station at 2.30pm and Roy met the Police at 4.45pm today.
The police started calling up the attendees to the #ReturnOurCPF protest on 27 September 2014 to investigate them for “unlawful assembly”. 10 attendees were called up.
Four attendees were let off with a warning. TRS broke the news yesterday that six of them were charged with “public nuisance”. Ms Han and Roy found out today that they were both charged with a second penalty under Regulation 23(2)(b).
TRS understands that at least two others attendees were called up for interview yesterday. It is unknown what the police will charge them with.
The Police charged that Ms Han and Roy were the organisers of the #ReturnOurCPF protest and claimed that they did not apply for a permit to protest.
According to the letter given to them, the Police charged that Ms Han and Roy “organise(d) a demonstration at the area in Hong Lim Park known as the Speakers’ Corner, without the approval of the Commissioner of the Parks and Trees” and have thus committed a crime.
http://i.imgur.com/DUnc7BS.jpg
On NParks website, registrants are required to register for their event as a “Speech”, “Demonstration” or “Performance”. It is understood that the police has charged Ms Han and Roy for applying only for a “Speech” and not a “Demonstration”.
In effect, the Police wants to charge the both of them on a technicality. This charge carries a penalty of $5,000.
The six Singaporeans who have been charged, including Ms Han and Roy, have been told to appear at the state court at 1 Havelock Square on Monday, 27 October 2014, at 10am to face the charge.
The police warned the six who were charged that if they do not turn up or if they are late, a warrant would be sent to arrest them.
It is understood, however, that Ms Han is the sole organiser of the #ReturnOurCPF event. However, the Police has also charged Roy to implicate him with an additional charge.
Roy has also been charged with an offence which carries a maximum $5,000 penalty. If anyone is fined more than $2,000 in court, this will also disqualify them from standing for elections.
If the prosecution has come directly from the government, this would mean that the government is going all out to not only silence the two of them but to also prevent them from going into Parliament to question the government on its use of Singaporeans’ Central Provident Fund (CPF) retirement funds.
Ms Han and Roy have been speaking up to advocate that the government is transparent and accountable to Singaporeans on their management of Singaporeans’ CPF. The government has yet to respond to their demands.
TRS understands from the latest updates that the lawyer of the six Singaporeans, including Ms Han and Roy, will be charging them $20,000 in legal fees. If the six of them receive the maximum penalty, they will be fined for a total of $16,000.
To exercise their freedom of speech and expression to protect the rights of Singaporeans, this will cost the six of them a total of $36,000.
In Singapore, freedom of speech is not free, as this latest incident has shown.
Click here to view the whole thread at www.sammyboy.com (http://sammyboy.com/showthread.php?192673-FAP-Poodles-Tighten-Noose-Around-HHH-amp-Roy-Additional-Charge-of-Illegal-Demonstratio&goto=newpost).