Sammyboy RSS Feed
13-05-2014, 01:30 AM
An honorable member of the Coffee Shop Has Just Posted the Following:
I don't understand why Singapore media wants to expose the five suspects who are 17 years old in the graffiti case (that hurled vulgarities at the PAP), yet keep the identity of the 17 years old female escort a secret? Fact is she willingly slept with so many men for money. What is the difference? Didn't research prove that girls mature earlier than boys?
Even though I'm a woman, I think its wrong to expose the boys when they are not proven guilty yet. It kinda conveys the message that PAP government is petty, and is all out to punish the young suspects before proving beyond reasonable doubt they are guilty.
http://happyartfood.blogspot.sg/2014...posing-17.html (http://happyartfood.blogspot.sg/2014/05/why-double-standard-in-exposing-17.html)
Click here to view the whole thread at www.sammyboy.com (http://sammyboy.com/showthread.php?181471-Why-the-Double-Standard-in-Exposing-17-Years-old-Minors&goto=newpost).
I don't understand why Singapore media wants to expose the five suspects who are 17 years old in the graffiti case (that hurled vulgarities at the PAP), yet keep the identity of the 17 years old female escort a secret? Fact is she willingly slept with so many men for money. What is the difference? Didn't research prove that girls mature earlier than boys?
Even though I'm a woman, I think its wrong to expose the boys when they are not proven guilty yet. It kinda conveys the message that PAP government is petty, and is all out to punish the young suspects before proving beyond reasonable doubt they are guilty.
http://happyartfood.blogspot.sg/2014...posing-17.html (http://happyartfood.blogspot.sg/2014/05/why-double-standard-in-exposing-17.html)
Click here to view the whole thread at www.sammyboy.com (http://sammyboy.com/showthread.php?181471-Why-the-Double-Standard-in-Exposing-17-Years-old-Minors&goto=newpost).