Sammyboy RSS Feed
31-07-2013, 02:00 AM
An honorable member of the Coffee Shop Has Just Posted the Following:
The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) said, “AGC would like to take the opportunity to reiterate that the proper forum in which factual issues in a pending matter before a court should be determined, is the court itself.”
Yet, in its statement of 29 July 2013, the same AGC said it has completed its review of the investigation papers relating to a cartoonist and decided not to take action against him under the Sedition Act. Meaning, the serious matter of sedition - overt conduct, such as speech and organization, that is deemed by the legal authority to tend toward insurrection against the established order - has been decided upon without the determination of the court.
- http://singaporedesk.blogspot.sg/201...rom-court.html (http://singaporedesk.blogspot.sg/2013/07/hearing-from-court.html)
Click here to view the whole thread at www.sammyboy.com (http://singsupplies.com/showthread.php?158437-Hearing-from-the-Court&goto=newpost).
The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) said, “AGC would like to take the opportunity to reiterate that the proper forum in which factual issues in a pending matter before a court should be determined, is the court itself.”
Yet, in its statement of 29 July 2013, the same AGC said it has completed its review of the investigation papers relating to a cartoonist and decided not to take action against him under the Sedition Act. Meaning, the serious matter of sedition - overt conduct, such as speech and organization, that is deemed by the legal authority to tend toward insurrection against the established order - has been decided upon without the determination of the court.
- http://singaporedesk.blogspot.sg/201...rom-court.html (http://singaporedesk.blogspot.sg/2013/07/hearing-from-court.html)
Click here to view the whole thread at www.sammyboy.com (http://singsupplies.com/showthread.php?158437-Hearing-from-the-Court&goto=newpost).