Sammyboy RSS Feed
25-07-2013, 10:40 PM
An honorable member of the Coffee Shop Has Just Posted the Following:
To date, the newspaper has not published my reply to the MCI’s Director of Corporate Relations.
In the polemic arguments about if I had reposted a friend’s post on Facebook verbatim, or if I had falsely reported, regarding the availability of N95 masks on Friday, 21 June 2013, I have so far only presented facts.
My responses are here: http://www.raviphilemon.net/2013/07/...to-engage.html (http://www.raviphilemon.net/2013/07/yaacob-in-crisis-isnt-it-good-to-engage.html)
here: http://www.raviphilemon.net/2013/07/...nications.html (http://www.raviphilemon.net/2013/07/response-to-minister-for-communications.html)
And here: http://www.straitstimes.com/premium/...plies-20130717 (http://www.straitstimes.com/premium/forum-letters/story/seeking-clarifications-online-blogger-replies-20130717).
I wonder why Mr Peer is puzzled by my explanations? I also wonder why my putting forth of facts to bring more clarity on the topic has been dismissed by MCI’s Director as trying to explain my deeds away.
I feel compelled to respond to Mr Peer’s letter to the Straits Times Forum page in a measured and appropriate manner to ensure that his serious charges against me do not remain unrebutted.
My unpublished letter to ST Forum:
- http://www.tremeritus.com/2013/07/25...-letter-on-st/ (http://www.tremeritus.com/2013/07/25/st-refuses-to-publish-ravi-philemons-reply-to-mcis-letter-on-st/)
Click here to view the whole thread at www.sammyboy.com (http://singsupplies.com/showthread.php?158034-ST-refuses-to-publish-Ravi-Philemon’s-reply-to-MCI’s-letter-on-ST&goto=newpost).
To date, the newspaper has not published my reply to the MCI’s Director of Corporate Relations.
In the polemic arguments about if I had reposted a friend’s post on Facebook verbatim, or if I had falsely reported, regarding the availability of N95 masks on Friday, 21 June 2013, I have so far only presented facts.
My responses are here: http://www.raviphilemon.net/2013/07/...to-engage.html (http://www.raviphilemon.net/2013/07/yaacob-in-crisis-isnt-it-good-to-engage.html)
here: http://www.raviphilemon.net/2013/07/...nications.html (http://www.raviphilemon.net/2013/07/response-to-minister-for-communications.html)
And here: http://www.straitstimes.com/premium/...plies-20130717 (http://www.straitstimes.com/premium/forum-letters/story/seeking-clarifications-online-blogger-replies-20130717).
I wonder why Mr Peer is puzzled by my explanations? I also wonder why my putting forth of facts to bring more clarity on the topic has been dismissed by MCI’s Director as trying to explain my deeds away.
I feel compelled to respond to Mr Peer’s letter to the Straits Times Forum page in a measured and appropriate manner to ensure that his serious charges against me do not remain unrebutted.
My unpublished letter to ST Forum:
- http://www.tremeritus.com/2013/07/25...-letter-on-st/ (http://www.tremeritus.com/2013/07/25/st-refuses-to-publish-ravi-philemons-reply-to-mcis-letter-on-st/)
Click here to view the whole thread at www.sammyboy.com (http://singsupplies.com/showthread.php?158034-ST-refuses-to-publish-Ravi-Philemon’s-reply-to-MCI’s-letter-on-ST&goto=newpost).