Sammyboy RSS Feed
10-06-2013, 02:20 AM
An honorable member of the Coffee Shop Has Just Posted the Following:
There you have it. NEA cannot even distinguish between Block 511 and Block 538. MP Faisal's letter of appeal and the complaint about refusing to clean high places was about Block 511. That was an issue that cropped up halfway, unrelated to 538
Block 538 was the origin to the saga surrounding the missing scaffolding on the day of the cleaning, and ATL's quotation to the Market Association giving breakdown of cleaning cost including cost of scaffolding for cleaning high places.
Two different blocks. Two different matters.
And all throughout the 2-week long saga, NEA has:
(a) Never clarified about its misleading email about providing scaffolding at Block 538.
(b) Never bothered to distinguish between Blk 511 and 538, instead lumping the two together and treating them as essentially the same incident
(c) Could never state whether WP has fulfilled its obligation under TC Act and whether it breached any of its guidelines with regard to HC cleaning
(d) Could never provide proof that hawkers were unfairly asked to pay something they shouldn't be paying
511 and 538. How difficult can it be. If you can confuse two blocks, can you confuse your role as a statutory board, or as a partisan player? Yes you can, and you have.
FOOL ON YOU.
Click here to view the whole thread at www.sammyboy.com (http://sammyboy.com/showthread.php?154072-511-and-538-So-near-yet-so-far-(AHPETC-vs-NEA)&goto=newpost).
There you have it. NEA cannot even distinguish between Block 511 and Block 538. MP Faisal's letter of appeal and the complaint about refusing to clean high places was about Block 511. That was an issue that cropped up halfway, unrelated to 538
Block 538 was the origin to the saga surrounding the missing scaffolding on the day of the cleaning, and ATL's quotation to the Market Association giving breakdown of cleaning cost including cost of scaffolding for cleaning high places.
Two different blocks. Two different matters.
And all throughout the 2-week long saga, NEA has:
(a) Never clarified about its misleading email about providing scaffolding at Block 538.
(b) Never bothered to distinguish between Blk 511 and 538, instead lumping the two together and treating them as essentially the same incident
(c) Could never state whether WP has fulfilled its obligation under TC Act and whether it breached any of its guidelines with regard to HC cleaning
(d) Could never provide proof that hawkers were unfairly asked to pay something they shouldn't be paying
511 and 538. How difficult can it be. If you can confuse two blocks, can you confuse your role as a statutory board, or as a partisan player? Yes you can, and you have.
FOOL ON YOU.
Click here to view the whole thread at www.sammyboy.com (http://sammyboy.com/showthread.php?154072-511-and-538-So-near-yet-so-far-(AHPETC-vs-NEA)&goto=newpost).